Thoughts
← Back to all writing

Trolley problem and trust

Can we trust 33 random people to do the right thing?

4 min read · Du Che Anh

The other day, I stumbled upon a post with a premise of the trolley problem that seems like it just another meme-infused hook that was made to bait comments from people having a laughter at the problem, but strangely, it got me thinking,

Can we trust 33 random people to do the right thing?

Why specifically 33 you ask, well it stems from the world population itself.

source: reddit/r/trolleyproblem
source: reddit/r/trolleyproblem

So here's the problem,

There's a train, you can pull a lever to send it hurtling towards a group of people, effectively ending all of them. But you can choose to not do so, you are released from this horrible situation, then the choice get pass onto someone random, but this time, the amount of people in the group DOUBLED. Starting with 1 person.

A genuinely smart mix of the modern day meme of "double it and give it to the next person" and our old-timer, the trolley problem. The problem however, lack proper GAME. I say we do this, if when everyone on earth is tied down to the track, no one dies. So to best preserve the human race on this planet, everyone just have to agree to not pull the lever, or is it?

source: worldometers.info
source: worldometers.info

Let say we have 8.3B people on this planet right now, it would take 2^33 to surpass that number by a small margin (8.6B), it means with the problem at hands, we would need 34 people not pulling the lever to reach that many people on the train track (It somehow holds that many).

If you are one of the people in this 34-people chain of fate, What will you do, Say, you are person number 21, accounting for 1,048,576 people's lives?

I'm genuinely don't know who I will choose to be in the situation (not the last one though). It is scary to be at the end of the string, especially when it involves all of humanity's tomorrow. But a choice must be made.

Are you actually a believe-type or just a pass-on person in the act of trying to redeem himself? If you are person #1, will you trade one life, to secure the hope of this world? Or save him, and entrust the 8.3 billions human lives to the next 33 random people to do the right thing?

In actuality, the world's crime rate is surprisingly low, and those who wish for humanity's demise should only account for a tiny part of that even. But the thing is, you only need one bad actor at the end of the chain to doom us all, so, What is your choice?